Key findings
- Across 302,008 written Google reviews in three Saudi cities, Dammam is the hardest crowd: it averages 4.03 stars against 4.21 in Jeddah and 4.19 in Riyadh.
- Only 64.3% of Dammam reviews are five stars, versus 70.7% in Jeddah and 70.7% in Riyadh — and 15.4% are one star, the highest of the three.
- 83.1% of Dammam's reviews are written in Arabic, well above Jeddah's 72.4% and Riyadh's 73.6%.
- Dammam's reviews are shorter (105.8 characters on average versus 131.0 and 123.7) and its reviewers are notably harder on cleanliness (topic average 3.95 versus 4.15 and 4.17).
Introduction
Every star rating hides a crowd. The same restaurant can look excellent in one city and merely good in another, not because the food changed, but because the people writing the reviews grade on a different curve. When we finished importing Dammam, we finally had three fully scored Saudi cities in one database, and we could ask a question we could not ask before: does the audience itself differ from city to city? The answer is yes, and Dammam stands out clearly.
This report is built from 302,008 written Google reviews across 1,917 businesses in Jeddah, Riyadh and Dammam. We read the text of each review, not just the star, and we compared the three cities on the same measures. Nothing here is an opinion about which city has better businesses. It is a description of how each city's reviewers behave when they sit down to write.
The three cities, side by side
| Measure | Jeddah | Riyadh | Dammam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.21 | 4.19 | 4.03 |
| Five-star share | 70.7% | 70.7% | 64.3% |
| One-star share | 12.9% | 13.4% | 15.4% |
| Arabic reviewer share | 72.4% | 73.6% | 83.1% |
| Average review length (characters) | 131.0 | 123.7 | 105.8 |
| Cleanliness topic average | 4.15 | 4.17 | 3.95 |
| Price topic average | 3.66 | 3.65 | 3.53 |
| Reviews analyzed | 103,794 | 124,779 | 73,435 |
What is real, and what is not
With tens of thousands of reviews per city — 73,435 in Dammam, 103,794 in Jeddah and 124,779 in Riyadh — small gaps are still meaningful and large ones are beyond any doubt. Dammam's 4.03 average sits about 0.17 stars below Jeddah and Riyadh, and its five-star share is more than six points lower. Those are real differences, not sampling noise. The same is true of the Arabic share, the shorter reviews, and the cleanliness gap.
One number that looks like a finding is not one. The gap between how Arabic and English reviewers rate is -0.42 in Jeddah, -0.44 in Riyadh and -0.36 in Dammam. That English-speakers rate higher is a well-established pattern we have written about before, but the spread between the three cities — a few hundredths of a star — is within the range of noise. We will not pretend Dammam's slightly smaller gap means anything. It does not.
A more Arabic city
The clearest structural difference is language. In Dammam, 83.1% of reviews are written in Arabic, against roughly 72.4% and 73.6% in the two larger cities. Because Arabic-writing reviewers rate lower on average everywhere (3.97 in Dammam versus 4.33 for English), a more Arabic city will naturally show a lower headline average. Part of Dammam's toughness is simply who is doing the writing. This is not a flaw in Dammam; it is a fact about its review population, and it explains a meaningful slice of the rating gap.
Shorter, blunter reviews
Dammam reviewers also write less. At 105.8 characters on average, a typical Dammam review is roughly a fifth shorter than a Jeddah one at 131.0. Short reviews tend to be blunter — a quick verdict rather than a balanced paragraph — which fits the lower ratings and the higher one-star share. When people take the time to write more, they tend to soften; when they write a single line, it is often because something was simply good or simply not.
Toughest on cleanliness
When we isolate reviews that discuss cleanliness, Dammam scores 3.95 against 4.15 in Jeddah and 4.17 in Riyadh. Price is the harshest topic in every city (3.53 in Dammam, 3.66 and 3.65 elsewhere), so that is not a Dammam story. Cleanliness is. If you run a business in the Eastern Province, this is the single area where local reviewers are least forgiving, and the easiest place to lose a star you did not need to lose.
An honest caveat about recency
One difference deserves a warning rather than a headline. Only 30.5% of Dammam's dated reviews fall in the last 180 days, against 50.1% in Jeddah and 54.5% in Riyadh — Dammam's captured reviews skew older. This is partly a genuine pattern, but it is also partly an artifact of how we collect data. Our importer pulls up to roughly 500 reviews per business, so a business with a smaller review base surfaces more of its older history. Dammam is our newest city with smaller review counts per business, so part of this "older" skew measures import depth, not reviewer behaviour. We flag it rather than build an argument on it.
How we measured
We scanned every one of the 302,008 written reviews using keyset pagination, so the figures cover the full dataset, not a sample. Language is inferred from the script of the text. Topic averages use the same keyword lists we apply across Raddod. Ratings here are plain review averages for description; they are not the Bayesian rankings we use to order businesses. We do not claim to be more accurate than Google — we simply read the written text Google leaves aside.
Who should read this closely
Two groups. Business owners in the Eastern Province should stop benchmarking themselves against Jeddah or Riyadh numbers, because a 4.3 in Dammam is a stronger result than a 4.3 in Jeddah — it was earned from a harder crowd. The practical priorities are clear from the data: guard cleanliness first, since that is where the local gap is widest, and remember that a large share of your reviewers write in Arabic, so your responses should too. The second group is anyone building a ranking or a top-ten that mixes cities. If you pool Dammam and Jeddah businesses on the raw average, Dammam places will be quietly penalised for the toughness of their audience rather than any real shortfall. City-aware baselines are not a nicety here; they are the difference between a fair comparison and a misleading one.
None of this makes Dammam a worse place to eat, shop or train. Harsh reviewers are, if anything, more informative — a five star from a tough crowd carries more signal than a five star from a generous one. The city simply keeps a stricter ledger, and reading it correctly means reading it on its own terms rather than against a national average that was set somewhere else.
What this means
If you compare a Dammam business to a Jeddah one on the raw star average alone, you are not comparing like with like. The Dammam number is produced by a tougher, more Arabic, more terse crowd. Read the reviews, weight cleanliness heavily, and judge each city against its own baseline. For more on how audiences differ, see our comparison of Jeddah versus Riyadh reviewers and our analysis of Arabic versus English reviewers.
Raddod reads Saudi Google reviews every day and turns them into plain answers. See where any business stands at raddod.com.